I firmly believe that open and ongoing communication between teachers and parents is essential for the success of students with disabilities. Just this week a parent reached out to me explaining that the school is not requiring all of the communication with any member of school staff must first be sent through the Assistant Principal. And now, the AP is complaining that she is getting too much communication from this parent and is threatening to "shut it down."

​Unfortunately, some schools are restricting communication channels and funneling all interactions through one person, often the case manager. This practice raises concerns among parents and begs the question: Can they do that? Can parents request two-way communication as an accommodation in their child's Individualized Education Program (IEP)? The answer is yes, it is, and it should be. In this post, we explore the regulations in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) that support the need for effective communication in IEPs.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) does not explicitly require ongoing communication between teachers and parents. Probably because when it was passed in 1975 congress could not imagine a school trying to limit communication with a parent. However, IDEA guarantees parents and their children with disabilities various legal rights, known as "Procedural Safeguards." These safeguards emphasize the importance of parental participation, highlighting parents' role as mandatory members of the IEP Team. While IDEA focuses on parental participation in the development of the IEP, it does not specifically address daily, ongoing communication with the school.

In 2017, Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), amending the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). ESSA emphasizes the need for parents to participate in regular, two-way, and meaningful communication involving student academic learning and other school activities. It recognizes parents as integral partners in their children's education and encourages their active involvement. You can find 20 US Code Section 6318 - Parent and Family Engagment, here.

Since Congress deemed effective communication so important that it was enshrined in ESSA, it is crucial for parents to advocate for this accommodation to be included in their child's IEP. By referencing the law and presenting their case during the IEP meeting, parents can firmly assert their right to ongoing dialogue with teachers. However, it's important to exercise this right responsibly, being mindful of teachers' time and workload. Reasonable, respectful communication ensures a productive and efficient partnership between parents and teachers.

Promoting effective communication between teachers and parents is not only common sense but also a legal obligation outlined in ESSA. I encourage parents to be proactive in asserting their rights to ongoing communication as an accommodation in their child's IEP. By working together, parents and teachers can create an inclusive educational environment that supports the unique needs of students with disabilities. Remember, it is not just common sense anymore, it is the law.

​For more information and guidance on Advocating 4 Fair Education, please visit advocating4faireducation.com or sign up for a 20-minute consultation, here.